Letter of dissent towards OGSM statement on Terengganu state Syariah Law

Photo used for illustration purposes only.
- Advertisement -

We, Muslim obstetricians and registered members of the Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society of Malaysia (OGSM) would like to distance ourselves from the statement made by the 2022/2023 OGSM Council on the 5th of December 2022 pertaining to the recent amendments to the Terengganu state Shariah law.

We are of the opinion that this statement was made prematurely without prior consultation with the Muslim members of the organization and most importantly, was made before any in depth clarification of the matter with the relevant legislative body.

- Advertisement -

This is especially important as this matter pertains to Islamic laws, which are only applicable to Muslims, and is also a reflection of our Islamic faith and convictions, protected by the constitution.

In order to gain more insight into this, a few Muslim members have engaged with the Terengganu state Shariah legislative personnel and collectively, we have come to the following conclusions:

  1. Pregnancies should best be planned and wanted pregnancies, hence the importance of prepregnancy care to ensure optimal maternal health and social circumstances before conception. Pregnancies out-of-wedlock do not conform to this notion and should be discouraged from a medical point of view.
  2. Marriage is the foundation of any society on which families are built and children brought into the world. It is essential in protecting lineage in Islam, one of the five main goals of Shariah law, otherwise known as Maqasid Shariah.
  3. Lineage protection in Islam serves to safeguard the most basic rights of children, which among others, guarantees their rights to inheritance, is essential in determining mahram and in our increasingly critical society, prevents shame when paternity is denied. This protection also indirectly extends to women and their rights to alimony when relationships go south.
  4. Shariah law provisions pertaining to pregnancies out-of-wedlock have already been in place as early as 1985, in at least eight other states in Malaysia before the Terengganu state amendments, which are well within the framework allowed by the constitution.
  5. Similar to the proposed Control of Tobacco Products and Smoking Bill 2022 tabled recently, many processes will need to ensue before this enactment can be executed. Ample time will be given to draw up the technicalities, taking into consideration views from various stakeholders involved including the medical fraternity. Moreover, education of the masses with regards to this new amendment will continue, as well as ongoing holistic efforts by the Terengganu state government to curb premarital intimate activities.
  6. Delving deeper into the technicalities, the amendments on pregnancies out-of-wedlock are only applicable to those 16 years old and above, and pregnant out of their own volition. Provisions for rape cases fall under the purview of the civil courts and not shariah courts.
  7. The maximum punishment that can be meted out are 3 years imprisonment, RM5000 fine and 6 strokes of the cane. It would be prudent to point out that Shariah laws are primarily meant to deter by instilling fear, rather than punish. This is especially crucial in cases of repeat offenders, often with different partners, posing immense burden to extended family members and social workers.
  8. Hence, it is the prerogative of the judge to decide the punishment suited to the circumstances and even practise leniency and compassion for first offenders, offenders who have repented and relatively young offenders. Offenders between the age of 10 and 16 years old are deemed young offenders and will not be eligible for imprisonment or caning. As an example, the enactment mentioned in Section 68 provides leniency for convicted female persons, whereby in lieu of the sentence, they can instead be rehabilitated in an approved home for a maximum of six months.
  9. Not surprisingly, there have also been instances in other states whereby convicted female persons have opted to receive the caning punishment under shariah law in lieu of paying the fine, as it is very much more lenient compared to the caning punishment received under civil law.
  10. It is also essential to highlight that punitive measures including the initial charges can only transpire after the birth of the child and hence, should not interfere with any antenatal care required by the mother. As such, concerns regarding community stigma and isolation during the duration of the pregnancy are disputable.
  11. We would also like to emphasize that these Shariah amendments actually have provisions in place to not only identify, but punish the male counterpart responsible for the pregnancy. As we are aware, in instances where the sexual act is consensual, there are no provisions under civil law to charge the male culprit, resulting in him to get off scot free. Is this then, not looking out for the welfare of women and girls, especially in cases of undisclosed incest cases where we now have an avenue to address these atrocious practices against vulnerable victims?
  12. We continue to affirm that education and community vigilance, hand in hand with state-led holistic measures which include punitive measures under Shariah Law, is vital to help reduce the alarming pregnancy out-of-wedlock statistics and contribute to better maternal and child health and well-being.

This is a joint statement by:

  1. Prof. Dr. Zainur Rashid bin Zainuddin
  2. To’ Puan Dr Maziah binti Ahmad Mahidin
  3. Prof. Madya Dato’ Dr Hamizah Ismail
  4. Prof. Dr. Zalina Nusee
  5. Prof. Madya Dr. Mohd Azam Mohd Yusoff
  6. Datuk Dr Noraihan binti Mohd Nordin
  7. Dr. Shahril bin Abu Bakar
  8. Dr. Azha Syahril Azizan
  9. Dr. Rosilawati binti Abdul Ghani
  10. Dr. Norashikin binti Abdul Fuad
  11. Dr. Rusinahayati binti Mokhtarudin
  12. Dr. Asmah Yun binti Mat Sidek
  13. Dr. Zamzida binti Yusoff
  14. Dr. Sukhilmi bin Othman
  15. Dr. Amilia Afzan binti Mohd Jamil
  16. Dr. Andi Anggeriana binti Andi Asri
  17. Dr. Nor Syahaniza Waheeda binti Alias
  18. Dr. Noraini binti Mulalek
  19. Dr. Malini binti Mat Napes
  20. Dr. Karimah binti Mohd
  21. Dr. Nasuha binti Yaacob
  22. Dr. Siti Nur Dina binti Ahmad Kamaruddin
  23. Dr. Mohd Fairudzi Afzanizam bin Salleh
  24. Dr. Nur Zaireena binti Zainal
  25. Dr. Norizan binti Kamarudin
  26. Dr. Siti Farhana binti Md Pauzi
  27. Dr. Rima Anggrena binti Dasrilsyah
  28. Dr. Nurul Iftida binti Basri
  29. Dr. Siti Azlina binti Abdul Karim
  30. Dr. Zainab Hananah binti Abang Abdullah
  31. Dr. Habibah binti Abdul Hamid
  32. Dr. Zulida binti Rejali
  33. Dr. Wan Norizah binti Wan Musa
  34. Dr. Rohaida binti Adam
  35. Dr. Kamarul Azhar bin Kamaruddin
  36. Dr. Wan Rosmidah binti Wan Abbas
  37. Dr. Fauziah binti Shari
  38. Dr. Nor Jumizah binti Abdul Kadir
  39. Dr. Norliza binti Mohd Ibrahim
  40. Dr. Liyana Mastura binti Md Jalaluddin
  41. Dr. Aida binti Othman
  42. Dr. Nurdhania binti Azhar
  43. Dr. Zulaikha binti Mohd Zahari
  44. Dr. Nur Adzlinda binti Kassim
  45. Dr. Nur Aini binti Mohammad Zain
  46. Dr. Missdalia binti Mat Kiah
  47. Dr. Anita Rina binti Ali
  48. Dr. Haslinda binti Mohd Daud
  49. Dr. Azalea Khairuddin
  50. Dr. Hamidah binti Omar
  51. Dr. Nor Fadzilah binti Mohd Yusof
  52. Dr. Noor Fidak binti Samsudin
  53. Dr. Mastura binti Mohd Mokhtar
- Advertisement -