Aussie outbreak due to failed quarantine

Local officials in protective gear help with baggage as Australian residents arrive at a hotel for mandatory 14-day quarantine

SYDNEY – A deadly outbreak of COVID-19 in Australia’s state of Victoria stemmed almost entirely from a hotel quarantine scheme intended to house returned overseas travelers, reported Xinhua news agency based on the findings of an inquiry.

Since late June, Victoria has experienced a resurgence of the virus, peaking at 725 daily infections on Aug. 5 and prompting a return to strict lockdowns, including a nightly curfew in the state capital of Melbourne.


Ben Howden, medical microbiologist and infectious diseases physician, told an inquiry into the scheme on Monday that according to genomic sequencing, 99 per cent of Victoria’s cases as of late July could be traced back to people returning from overseas.

While Howden did not refer directly to the hotel quarantine programmes or those within it, it has been the policy of the Australian government to house all returning travelers in hotel quarantine, operated at a state level since March.

With Victoria’s daily case numbers subsiding in recent weeks, attention has turned firmly to the failures of the hotel quarantine system, with allegations that it was badly mishandled allowing for the infection to spread into the community.

Evidence has shown multiple lapses of protocol by security guards who critics say were not sufficiently trained or equipped to be working in virus containment.

Microbiologist and infectious disease expert, Lindsay Grayson, told the inquiry that an online training programme for the guards was “confusing” and “misleading.”

“The majority of it is like a training module for the general public, rather than someone who is going to come into direct contact or be responsible for managing COVID patients,” Grayson said.

Barrister Tony Neal QC (Queen’s Counsel) said Victoria’s hotel quarantine programme “fell short of its goal” to prevent COVID-19 spreading into the community.

Neal added that the inquiry would seek to determine who was responsible for overseeing the programme and whether the training of staff was sufficient.